Response to Bollinger's "On the Impossibility of Keeping Out Eavesdroppers Using Only Classical Physics" and to Some Other Comments at Bruce Schneier's Blog Sites

First we refute Bollinger's arguments because they are irrelevant for the Kirchhoff-loopJohnson(-like)-noise classical physical cipher. Then we compare the basic properties of quantum communicators with the classical cipher and show why the properties of the classical one are superior to the properties of quantum. Then, we answer the retardation (waves, delays, transients) related comments, which have already been dealt with in the first paper on the classical cipher and resulted in the bandwidth limit published there. Finally, we point out that breaking the code of the idealized cipher violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics thus such a task is equivalent with building a perpetual motion machine.